The super fund should increase the proportion invested in NZ?
|
On average, everyone agrees with significant nonconsensus between 29 voters. |
|
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The super fund should increase the proportion invested in NZ
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Reasons To DisagreeIt should invest wherever it thinks it will get the best long-term return (subject to a few possible "moral" constraints) 1 March 2010
The Super Fund should be invested where it gives the perceived best return. 10 October 2010
The super fund has an obligation to get the best return it can to those who have had their money taken from them and if that means NZ companies than great also if it doesn't than great too. 27 August 2012
|
Reasons To AgreeThat would be the ideal but NZ has limited oppertunites for good quality investment. 1 November 2008
|
Reasons for Remain Neutral
The super fund should be invested where it will gain the most - it's there to provide pensions for those who take part.
Super fund should be privatised - its already halfway there as it acts like a private fund in a private company. See no reason the government must have a hand in it.
My View
You can make your comments once you have voted.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Back to all voting categories
or
Back to "Economy and Company Law"
