The super fund should increase the proportion invested in NZ?


On average, everyone agrees with significant nonconsensus between 29 voters.

Disagree
 
Agree

Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

The super fund should increase the proportion invested in NZ

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.


Reasons To Disagree

It should invest wherever it thinks it will get the best long-term return (subject to a few possible "moral" constraints)

1 March 2010

The Super Fund should be invested where it gives the perceived best return.

10 October 2010

The super fund has an obligation to get the best return it can to those who have had their money taken from them and if that means NZ companies than great also if it doesn't than great too.

27 August 2012

 

Reasons To Agree

That would be the ideal but NZ has limited oppertunites for good quality investment.

1 November 2008

Reasons for Remain Neutral

The super fund should be invested where it will gain the most - it's there to provide pensions for those who take part.

15 March 2009

Super fund should be privatised - its already halfway there as it acts like a private fund in a private company. See no reason the government must have a hand in it.

13 May 2009

My View

You can make your comments once you have voted.

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.

Back to all voting categories or
Back to "Economy and Company Law"

Please tell all your friends to come and vote, and please link to our website if you can.

We use Website World Free Website Builder to easily update our website ourselves
and provide you with this voting software.