Activist groups who train for war with guns in the forests shoud be charged under terrorism laws?
On average, everyone agrees with significant nonconsensus between 35 voters.
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Activist groups who train for war with guns in the forests shoud be charged under terrorism laws
Reasons To Disagree
I think you have to have pretty good proof that they pose an imminent threat, eg you can proove they are planning an imminent attack. People take guns in the forest all the time to hunt pigs. Private soldiers and security guards should be able to train. Even if you know they have nationalist motives, i don't think thats enough to prove someone intends to kill premediatively. I'd like to see some stronger evidence of the proposed threat.
29 October 2007
The police commit unspeakable acts of cruelty to prisoners, the government is ripping off every one and just bribing the majority middle class to stay in power, fuck the government fuck the law and order, go tama iti
27 March 2008
Reasons To Agree
Some of the weapons these people had were illegal and others had no licence to have weapons, there is no doubt they were not intending to organise a peaceful protest.
1 November 2007
Where they are training to commit violent criminal acts.
7 February 2008
If activists threaten violence in any way they shoud [sic] be dealt with by any appropriate law. AND BTW - you should use your smelling checquer!
17 February 2008
Why not! They still have to be proven guilty under the NZ legal system. It seems to me that there is a case of some sort to be answered and perhaps best answered in court.
28 October 2008
Reasons for Remain NeutralNo reasons have yet been given to remain neutral.
You can make your comments once you have voted.