|
On average, everyone
agrees
with
significant nonconsensus
between 39 voters.
|
|
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Government should not significantly interfere in the market dynamics of building industry
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Reasons To Disagree
Then what would government do?
From how i see it the goverments job is to govern everything above land owner.
|
|
Reasons To Agree
Government should always have a consistent and stable influence on "edge" of the building industry to build more quality low cost homes for those who can ill afford them, and provide some consistent employment in that sector. However, it is inefficient for it to interfere with upper/middle class property developments. Let market forces dictate those prices. Let the goverment merely influence via its parallel (yet consistent) building developments.
including over bidding for floor space required for helen's burgeoning bureaucracy, foring up inflation and interest rates!
Other than assuring that the standards they set are adequate, and policing those standards effectively - KEEP OUT OF IT. Gummint is largely responsible for the leaky house prob.
|
Reasons for Remain Neutral
What does significantly mean in this context?
My View
You can make your comments once you have voted.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Back to all voting categories
or
Back to "Housing"
