|
On average, everyone
agrees
with
nonconsensus
between 44 voters.
|
|
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
New subdivision property developers should contribute more to regional transport infrastructure
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Reasons To Disagree
the residents should. this worked 4 Louisiana USA in the 1920s. roads increase land value. it's in their interests.
NO -the costs are astronomical as it is and it simply pushes up the cost of housing.
|
|
Reasons To Agree
Each new subdivision places increased demands, not just on their own local roading, but on future demands of rail and motorways.
Why not
$50000 at a minimum
|
Reasons for Remain Neutral
I remain neutral on this one because...It is in many ways a good idea. Every development does add more problems that there never seems to be a burden on developers to try to mitigate - not just in regional transport but also in general terms of local city infrastructure such as water supply and waste water systems capacity to handle new development. This is also a council problem for allowing development in areas where the infrastructure cannot cope with additional dwellings - however, if there was a levy in place, maybe the councils could use this money to develop the infrastructure so that it CAN cope. Overall, though, in a market where housing is already serioulsy over priced, my biggest concern is that the costs would be passed on and simply exacerbate the current housing problem further. Good idea but problematic - I remain Neutral.
My View
You can make your comments once you have voted.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Back to all voting categories
or
Back to "Housing"
