Government ownership of key infrastructure ensures the greatest benefit for a country?


On average, everyone agrees with nonconsensus between 362 voters.

Disagree
 
Agree

Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Government ownership of key infrastructure ensures the greatest benefit for a country

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.


Reasons To Disagree

Yeah - right! Remember the railways in public hands? Gummint ownership of anything creates the worst monopoly possible - a self-serving, voracious monster.

20 May 2006

in practice a gov't wrecks gr8 theory! govt cld invest on our behalf, thn giv us t shares bt instead it pockets t cshflw 4 votes

16 December 2007

And how many of these plonkers have every run a profitable business?. Their history of selling key assets to money hungry foreign companes to strip back to bare basics and resell back to Govt or bail out is not a great business model.

19 September 2008

What is 'key infrastructure'? And how elastic is that definition? When would stop housing or banking or building etc., from becoming 'key infrastructure'? A company succeeds or fails based on its performance and its service delivery - bad companies are stopped by their own failures and good companies remain because of their successes. Governments, on the other hand, don't have the same the checks and balances - what stops a government from providing a minimal service for maximal price? What incentive do they have to make things cheap and efficient? What makes them go away if they fail? [A ballot box comes too late and doesn't guarantee that things will be fixed with a 'new' government] It's pretty clear that anything in the government's hands are mere political tools.

13 May 2009

Funny how that never worked in any country that has done so now and throughout history. Just take a look at America and the lobbyist movement there, it only exists because of the kind of power given to government by this sort of lunacy.

27 August 2012

 

Reasons To Agree

OUR TRANSPORT IS CRAP.ATLEAST WE COULD FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO MAKE IT BETTER BY VOTING ON IT!!! it would also add vital income thus lowering our taxes sensibly instead of short term politics that is currently played

15 February 2006

I dont know if it ensures the greatest benefit, but I do think that at least it would focus the companies efforts towards dealing with NZ's needs rather than an international corporates pockets. It might also help the government to focus on its key responsibilities rather than getting sidetracked by so many non issues. I do worry that successive governments will use them as a labour sink hole as they have done historically.

25 March 2006

Strategic infrastructure should remain in government ownership. Security is one reason. Government?s role is not to run businesses; it does not have the right skills. A good compromise for the benefit of the country is for government to delegate the operation of business while retaining ownership. This should be done without interference other that the normal regulatory process.

6 August 2006

A government owned enterprize that is for the benifit of the people IE transport, can effectively run at a loss, employ a lot of people and provide a great service that can be subsidised by the Tax payer.The Tax payer has ownership in the country as apposed to, selling off assets that initially the tax payer built, Receive short term gain that is totally subjective as it is never seen and the services to the people suffer.

28 October 2007

Some industries just shouldn't function with a profit motive in mind. Simple examples are things like Roads, Fibre optic cables/phoneline, Police, Armed forces, Hospitals, Schools, ACC, Welfare, Search and Rescue and Prisons to name a few. Conversely there should be an oversight committee that looks carefully into each state owned company and ensures that it is performing at an adequate level.

13 August 2014

Reasons for Remain Neutral

The moment politicians get their fingers into any pie, they start to use it to manipulate their electoral advantage. They cannot be trusted to look after it in the "national interest". But then the same is true of international corporations.

22 May 2006

My View

You can make your comments once you have voted.

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.

Back to all voting categories or
Back to "Economy and Company Law"

Please tell all your friends to come and vote, and please link to our website if you can.

We use Website World Free Website Builder to easily update our website ourselves
and provide you with this voting software.