The infrequency of public transport is a good reason not to use it?
|
On average, everyone agrees with nonconsensus between 177 voters. |
|
Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The infrequency of public transport is a good reason not to use it
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Reasons To DisagreePublic transport isn't infrequent at all. Please give me examples of where you think it is. 16 March 2007
Plan ahead. Use the bus or train. Employers should be more amenable to people who use public transport. 2 December 2012
|
Reasons To AgreeOne and a half hours and three transport changes to travel on pubilc transport, to avoid a twenty min car trip. I don't think so. 13 December 2006
Absolutely! 28 September 2008
public transport shuld changed from buses to vans and run route at 5 minute intervals 18 February 2010
In Auckland cancellation of a service is a regular event. Penalties should be given to the operator when they do not deliver and a replacement service put in place, like they do in other parts of the country ie Christchurch. 14 October 2013
|
Reasons for Remain Neutral
No reasons have yet been given to remain neutral.My View
You can make your comments once you have voted.
You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.
Back to all voting categories
or
Back to "Roads and Petrol Taxes"
