Government should tax tobacco over and above the cost to the health system, to make it prohibitively expensive for children to start smoking.?


On average, everyone agrees with significant nonconsensus between 247 voters.

Disagree
 
Agree

Please read the comments from other voters below, then scroll down make your decision. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Government should tax tobacco over and above the cost to the health system, to make it prohibitively expensive for children to start smoking.

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.


Reasons To Disagree

Wouldn't it just be easier to prohibit the sale of it to anyone under the age of 20 and anyone who hasn't got grey hair is to be asked for ID. Then again if kids are exposed to parents who smoke they are probably going to have the same health issues, so why not just prohibit it altogether(but then the government would loose all the tax money. Boo Hoo)

25 August 2005

Once a government alleviates negative externalities on other people (e.g. in this case, the effects of passive smoking; costs to the health system) its role ends. The state should not intervene to supercede individual rights of choice when all negative externalities are accounted for.

30 August 2005

Kids start smoking from freebies they get from others (including parents) or ones they steal from people.

30 September 2005

There are many cash cows the government sucks on continuosly, this is just one of them. Petrol and alchohol are another good example. The government likes cash cows like this, it will never increase the price beyond the citizens ability to pay because it needs the numbers of users to be consistent to feed its ever increasing gluttony

24 April 2006

selling the cigarettes to minors is not the problem no matter how tough the laws get there will always be a way for cigarettes to end up in the hands of teenagers, its what we should do to prevent cigarettes from coming in to the country

6 August 2007

Yeah - right! Then they'll nick the fags instead. Nanny State again - MYOB!

17 February 2008

Yes restrict my freedom by making a public health system then use it to justify restricting my freedoms even more. Whoever thought of this question is pure evil.

27 August 2012

 

Reasons To Agree

Smoking is a terrible habit and the more expensive the better

26 October 2006

Selling tobacco at a higher price won't do much difference but it will make it harder for youths to start smooking regularly so youths may start stealing buying ilegaly etc. cigarettes from other people.

6 August 2007

internationally and in NZ it's shown that increase in taxation stops initiation and reduces consumption - a no brainer!

1 October 2007

I agree with the last comment. Smoking related diseases kill more people than all the illegal drugs put together. It clogs up our hospitals who are at breaking point. Just ban them. Sure there might be an underground movement to sell them illegally and you can stop this but it sure as hell makes it harder for smokers to stay addicted. Addiction help needs to be free. This cost would offset comnpletely and more the present long term health costs we all pay in taxes.

17 July 2009

Reasons for Remain Neutral

why dont they just ban the importation of it? Dogs can sniff out drugs, they can sniff out tobacco...a black market?? how would we have a black market if imports a stopped? oooooh hang on! the government is making a sh*t load of money here....

4 July 2008

I think they should ban the importation of tobacco for everyone's sake. And try to help those who already smoke, get OFF the stuff!

16 July 2008

My View

You can make your comments once you have voted.

You need to register a voting profile or login before you can vote.

Back to all voting categories or
Back to "Health"

Please tell all your friends to come and vote, and please link to our website if you can.

We use Website World Free Website Builder to easily update our website ourselves
and provide you with this voting software.